Questions of judicial overreach and governance in Pakistan | Arab News

This article was published in Dawn on May 26, 2020 and is available at the following link

Judiciary-executive relations have been traditionally uneasy in Pakistan. To an extent, this relationship is considered desirable in a democracy because it is in line with the scheme of checks and balances. However, when the desirable tension among the organs of the state –  executive, judiciary and legislature – turns into a turf war, it becomes a problem. Realizing that the relationship in Pakistan is in need of review and, probably, repair too, the former Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP), Asif Saeed Khosa underlined the importance just a day before he took over as CJP in January last year. He said:
“Let us discuss the alleged encroachment of the executive domain by the judiciary through interference in matters of policy, the alleged excessive use of its constitutional jurisdiction in matters which are administrative in nature and how best the judiciary can return to its normal but effective adjudicatory role.”
There was a fresh reminder of the possible ‘alleged encroachment of the executive domain by the judiciary’ recently when the Supreme Court passed an order to open shopping malls which were closed down by the government as a coronavirus lockdown measure. The Supreme Court also declared the weekly two-day closure of businesses illegal and also took exception to ‘huge’ spending by National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA) on coronavirus-related equipment and protective gear. The judgment was particularly embarrassing for the Sindh provincial government which, with the largest number of confirmed cases among the provinces and territories of Pakistan, had been forcefully advocating a stricter lockdown.
How far should the judiciary give directions in administrative matters or pass orders in the realm of governance? The question has perplexed the legal fraternity as well as experts and practitioners of governance around the globe and there is hardly any agreement over where to draw the line.

These kind of Supreme Court orders on governance issues have been branded as judicial overreach by some eminent lawyers and lawyers’ organizations. They maintain that the Constitution of Pakistan stipulates separation of powers among the three organs of the state and governance-related decision making is the privilege of the executive which should not be interfered with unless there is a clear breach of law.

Ahmed Bilal Mehboob

If a government is not taking decisive and timely action and as a result the basic rights of people are getting affected, the judiciary usually considers it their duty to fill the gap and give directions.
The Pakistani constitution authorizes the Supreme Court under Article 184 (3), commonly known as ‘suo moto’ powers, to make an order if it considers that a question of public importance regarding the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights is involved. The Supreme Court of Pakistan recently invoked the same powers while reviewing government performance in combating COVID-19.
The reluctance of the parliament in actively exercising its powers of oversight of the executive might have also prompted the Court to take suo moto notice in this case.
Parliamentary leadership was taking time to agree on the dates when the two houses of parliament could meet and whether the sittings would be virtual, in-person or hybrid. The parliamentary committee especially constituted by the Speaker for the oversight of government performance on COVID-19 could not proceed apace because the Speaker himself fell victim to coronavirus and had to confine himself to his residence. Finally, when the two houses met briefly, the members of the ruling party and the opposition preferred to score political points rather than debate the strategy to combat the virus. If the legislature does not like suo moto notices, it needs to improve its performance, it seems.  
The Pakistan Bar Council, Supreme Court Bar Association and legal experts in general have historically opposed the arbitrary recourse to Article 184 (3) by the Supreme Court.
Also, there is a legacy of ‘expensive’ judgments made by the Supreme Court in the past especially while dealing with technical subjects. For example, Pakistan faces a penalty of $6 billion imposed by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) in 2019 partly because the Supreme Court had struck down the Reko Diq mining contract signed between the government of Balochistan and an international company, TCC. Another example is that of the Turkish Karkey Power Company which successfully won an ICSID award of US $860 million against the government of Pakistan in 2017 because the Supreme Court had ordered the termination of the contract with Karkey.
These kind of Supreme Court orders on governance issues have been branded as judicial over-reach by some eminent lawyers and lawyers’ organizations. They maintain that the Constitution of Pakistan stipulates separation of powers among the three organs of the state and governance-related decision making is the privilege of the executive which should not be interfered with unless there is a clear breach of law.
Reverting back to the analysis by the former CJP Khosa, should his idea of holding an inter-institutional dialogue at the summit level be seriously considered in order to avoid ‘encroachment’ of one organ into the turf of the other?

Follow ABM on Social Media


Latest Articles

Latest Tweets




Proficient and highly skilled in information technology with a broad background in project management, Digital marketing, Web Development, Graphic designing, Video Editing, IT security, Computer operations, Implementations, Network administration, End-user support, Troubleshooting, Hardware / Software. Improves processes to increase efficiencies. A dependable problem solver who seizes opportunities to improve upon existing operations to increase a business standing in the marketplace.

  • First Name: Syed M
  • Last Name: Bilal
  • Date of birth: 24 November 1990
  • Nationality: Pakistan
  • Phone: +923336874433
  • Address: Lahore, Pakistan
  • Email:
  • Languages: English-Urdu-Arabic

IT & Digital merketing Officer - PILDAT

2023 - Continue

IT & Digital merketing Officer - Sapphire

2022 - 2023

IT Manager - Hajvery University

2021 - 2022

  • Maintain and update different websites under the use of PILDAT.
  • Manage and use e-mail marketing platforms like GoDaddy and Mail Chimp.
  • Troubleshoot various end-user computer issues.
  • Proficient in graphic designing using tools like Canva.
  • Skilled in video editing with Final Cut.
  • Implement YouTube SEO, social media marketing (SMM), thumbnail creation, optimization, and keyword research.
  • Troubleshoot network-related issues, including LAN, WAN, switches, routers, internet, broadband, and servers.
  • Oversee all Digital marketing campaigns in the company.
  • Implement the strategy to generate leads.
  • Promote the business, product, or service.
  • Ensure the company is communicating the right messaging to attract prospective customers and retain existing ones to generate leads.
  • Planning digital marketing campaigns, including web, SEO/SEM/SMM/PPC, email, social media, and display advertising.
  • Maintaining a social media presence across all digital channels.
  • Measuring and reporting on the performance of all digital marketing campaigns.
  • Provide technical support all over the company operations.

Superior University

BS Computer Science (BSCS) - Superior University

2013 - 2017

Cisco Certified Network Associate (CCNA) - Corvit


Fundamentals of Digital Marketing - Google


  • C++ / C#


Years Experience


Done Projects


Happy Customers

This will close in 0 seconds







Lahore, Pakistan

Social Profiles
Feel free to drop me a line

If you have any suggestion, project or even you want to say Hello.. please fill out the form below and I will reply you shortly.

Contact Form Demo

This will close in 0 seconds




Image 1
Image 2
Image 3
Image 4


Image 01
Image 02
Image 3
Image 04


This will close in 0 seconds